• ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I can’t believe you forgot the adage:

      Two-four-one-point-three, oxygen glows green.
      Two-four-one-point-five, glows red like a fire.

      They are astronomers, they calculated the height in metric units. The fact that the threshold works out to exactly .15 kilomiles is a coincidence. /s

  • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    For those like me wondering why oxygen emission depends on altitude, it’s that the excited lifetime is very long for red, so it tends to decay via collisions at lower altitudes.

  • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    TIL, there’s oxygen molecules above 240Km. I thought there’s hardly anything above 100Km and that’s why they set it as the lowest boundaries of space.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      There is hardly anything. However, there’s never nothing. The atmosphere is a thin and continuously decreasing thing, but there’s no point where it stops. Space is nearly a vacuum, but technically not totally. It’s close enough that we normally say it is, but there are particles bouncing around.

        • phcorcoran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s a cool photo, thanks for sharing.

          For more context why this wouldn’t be related to redshift, redshift is a concept in physics for light that’s analogous to the Doppler shift for sound. The typical example of Doppler shift is the EEEEE-OO-UUUUUM sound a car makes when moving fast past you. When the car is speeding away from you, the sound pitch is noticeably lower

          Similarly, when a light emitter moves away from you at extremely fast speeds (i.e. hundreds of millions of meters or yards per second), the light you see reaching you will be shifted down in frequency, towards red in visible light. This can happen in other more complicated relativistic situations too but they are less easy to explain and also not applicable here

          I don’t know why the people in the photo see this beautiful red aurora but redshift is almost certainly not a related concept here

          • cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Oh I think I got things confused there. I was referring to the phenomenon where the sky looks red-pinkish on evenings because the Rayleigh scattering.

            • phcorcoran@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Yeah I would say that one could explain the picture here

              Ultimately, the phenomenon is happening much much higher up in the atmosphere, so being a few kilometers closer vertically won’t make a difference; but by being further up on the ground, you could see an aurora from further away and through a lot more molecules that could scatter non-red light

  • Xy_Lemmy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why is the distance in miles a whole number while the distance in metric is not?