• m0darn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Calling it “the party jug” pretty much tells everyone exactly what it’s for…

    …sharing with a large group of people?

    this is obviously directed at quite a young audience

    To me it seems aimed at people that want to buy a lot of alcohol for not very much money, which tends to be young people, but they don’t seem to have done anything in particular to target young people.

    1 liter of vodka is more than enough to kill a healthy adult by alcohol poisoning. It’s not the size of the container that prevents that. Are these 4 liter jugs less expensive than 1 liter bottles?

    If you want to prevent alcohol deaths you should focus on addressing the causes of alcoholism (I’m not an expert but shooting from the hip: loneliness and hopelessness) and drunk driving (again, not an expert but: transit infrastructure).

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      1 liter of vodka is more than enough to kill a healthy adult by alcohol poisoning.

      Laughs in Finnish

      • m0darn@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I definitely removed some qualifiers to avoid overly hedging my point, so yes I concede that not every healthy adult would be killed by consuming 1L of vodka in a single sitting.

        Although I would also point out that a person that thinks that drinking a liter of vodka is laughably safe, is probably not healthy.

    • Sprawlie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      You kind of countered your own comment at the end

      One of the leading causes of alcoholism is cheap access to alcohol

      • m0darn@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ve done some toggling and found this article abstract.

        and what I have to say is this:

        Touche.

        Key sentence:

        The results also suggested that compared with general price increases, minimum- pricing policies might affect harmful drinkers proportionally more…

        I guess I’d be pleased to see the provincial Alberta government embrace epidemiologically based policy making. Especially if they do it consistently and not just when it aligns with their ideology.

        • Sprawlie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          For alcohol, because of it’s prevalence in society, yet known destructiveness, it is a very prickly topic. Historically we already know that prohibition is the worst solution to the problem and has far worse outcomes.