Even though the age pattern in spending is presently out-of-whack, the government is showing progress in delivering concrete policies that will make lives better for young people

  • Someone@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    The most insane part to me is that the minimum threshold to start cutting back OAS is $80,000 when it’s only $35,000 for the CCB. This should be flipped, a fundamental requirement of the CCB is that you have a whole extra person (or more) to take care of. How does it make any sense that a senior needs more than double to live on than a whole family?

      • Someone@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Child care benefit and Old age security. They’re both benefits paid out periodically throughout the year.

        (They were also both in the article)

    • Kelsenellenelvial@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Considering the median individual income in Canada is close to $45k, that’s a good point. Maybe there’s an argument that seniors have additional living expenses with healthcare or living in an assisted living or full-time care facility, but I feel like it should then be a lower OAS clawback with supports available for those with particularly high expenses.

      • nyan@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Or we could subsidize the health care and the assisted living, etc. facilities directly. I wonder if anyone’s actually done a study on which is more expensive. (Of course, any attempt to do this would probably make certain whiny premiers raise even more jurisdictional issues.)