So they might have year long projects with universities in Israel = they are complicit in genocide?
So they might have year long projects with universities in Israel = they are complicit in genocide?
How are they complicit in it?
Complicity in genocide? Okay?
The color grading of the years is really bad. The last 20/30 years are all very low in contrast compared to each other, while 1940s and 60s are easy to tell apart, where it is least important. There are so many more colors than yellow/orange/brown, we can use them to get more information density.
But not in this case (since it is not water-air) and not in that orientation.
They all will mix if you give them some time, except for the 2 oils.
German for “the Bart, the”.
Why should oil not be clear, almost colorless?
The oil has to be above the water.
Dish soap comes in any color. Water can be colored any way.
We know which one is milk. We know that dish soap is denser than water. We know oil is less dense than all of those. Does not leave at lot of wiggle room.
How to get the ratings of a series on IBDb?
I do not understand how that has anything to do with this topic.
The people in the other country do that because they want to, Germany is not forcing them, right? Germany moved it to them on their own free will too, right?
I agree. An apple tree is super uncomplicated. How to do that with actual abilities people have? Be out randomly or from training.
Image a tiny woman or man that want to work as a fire fighter. Now what? There is no way to make them stronger and bigger, which you need to be to handle the equipment, rescue people etc.
Someone has a disability and can’t walk? We can easily add ramps to buildings and help them up.
Oh no, 1.77 %…
That’s not the point, which is that the results are indeed mostly very similar, unlike what OP claims.
I never said that only looking at p values is a good idea or anything else like that.
If we only look that those with p <0.05 (green) and with 95 % confidence interval, then there are 17 teams left. And they all(!) agree with more than 95% conference.
What do you mean, all different? Most are exactly the same. The first 4 are a bit low and the last 3 a bit high, but last 2 and first also extremely wide, so irrelevant anyway. Everything else agrees, most within >99 % confidence with only slight differences on the absolute values.
No, that is not what complicit means.
Using the same logic: You pay taxes? Complicit in everything that happens with those. From good to bad. Not stopping cars on the road? Complicit in stealing buses etc. their customers. And of course also complicit in road kills.