No, I don’t pledge allegiance to the monarch.
This sounds like some “sovereign citizen” crap finding it’s way into Canada. The only thing that stance is good for is schadenfreude when a judge makes “SovCits” aware of the fact that they are, in fact, subject to the law.
One of the most important things to remember about scams is that there’s almost never an “act now” urgency with legitimate investigations/actions. Even in cases of crimes where people are arrested on the spot they have the right to talk to a lawyer before anything proceeds legally. The authorities are not contacting groups of citizens over the phone to tell them they’ll be arrested/lose everything in 24 hours if they don’t comply.
If someone is telling you that you need to do something IMMEDIATELY and you need reassurance, first off realize it’s almost certainly a load of crap. Tell them to send their requests to you in writing, hang up, and contact your bank and/or the institutions that are apparently investigating you (CRA, Police, etc.)
deleted by creator
This is what happens when you vote against people you hate instead of for policies you support. The “doesn’t matter what X does, at least they aren’t Y” mentality is ruining the “representative” portion of representative democracies.
Ah, now I get why it’s being downvoted. What a lousy spin to put on something so necessary as minimum wage increases.
The only reason I read the article was to figure out why LGBTQ+ was going broke in Canada. Given that (as near as I can tell) “Pride” has been associated with LGBTQ+ (or their historical analogs) since about the 70’s, that’s quite the name for an unaffiliated company.
Is anyone else annoyed by the advice that young people should give up hope of paying their own mortgage for their own home in favor of paying their landlord’s mortgage via rent? “People need to shift the idea that to be successful you have to own a home. It’s just not going to be in the cards for some people, and they’re in a worse position for trying to own a house,” she said.”
I say that instead of telling young people to give up on goals we should, as a nation, protect owning a home as if it was a basic necessity and do something about large %'s of homes/condos being owned by investors. It was possible to buy a home on a single income just a few generations ago. I’m sure it can be again if we make housing security a priority.
I want to avoid being too abusive, but it’s the not-so-clever person’s idea of what a well-thought-out argument looks like. They are akin the folks who abuse “creative accounting” to dodge taxes, but not as well-researched (or rich enough to hire someone who is).