![](/static/213bde8/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
They’ve committed the worst crime imaginable — threatening the future profits of the corporatocracy!
They’ve committed the worst crime imaginable — threatening the future profits of the corporatocracy!
Both are required to drop the price and return to affordability as building new housing takes time and has hard limitations.
The reality is that the level of immigration should be dictated by the level of new housing and overall service and infrastructure investment. If you add people without alignment to these you’re just degrading the housing security, quality of service, and overall quality of life for the vast majority of existing residents.
This also means that millions of immigrants could be accommodated per year if the level of new housing and investment were sufficiently high enough.
Most of the people in any position to actually do something about it, including regulators.
*To slow down fucking up the world by even a few %. Instead we shuffle numbers around to make it look like we’re doing something.
Shhhh. Don’t forget to act surprised, as though this is some perplexing consumer problem instead of a clear and present capitalism problem.
Don’t worry. A massive fire will destroy entire towns, and they’ll probably blame the libs.
Although this might be accurate, what would be the true cost of gas if you removed all the subsidies and added the cost of fossil fueled warming from the continued GHG release? What will be the cost of gas if climate change really starts to pop and we undergo radically accelerated decarbonization? What is the projected cost of renewables + batteries + electric heating in 5, 10 or 20 years?
These are more relevant details regarding the building of infa that should be built to last, and is costed to last, for several decades.