That doesn’t make sense unless this was personal expenditure, which it doesn’t seem to be
That doesn’t make sense unless this was personal expenditure, which it doesn’t seem to be
But… from when? Surely expenditure hasn’t gone up linearly with time
…how did the line come about? How did they determine what the life expectancy would have been with less expenditure per capita?
Ooh good catch. That makes sense. Not sure I would call this beautiful, especially without any way to tell how much time has passed, but fair enough