• Kichae@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Email’s a really awful way of doing it just because how dehumanizing it is. An employer should be forced to look at the person whose livelihood they’re taking away - forced to feel uncomfortable. Doing it by email is easier for them, and so shouldn’t be acceptable.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      An employer should be forced to look at the person whose livelihood they’re taking away

      In my experience, the decision is made several levels above the person who is tasked with actually meeting the about-to be-laid-off employees.

      The people making those decisions never have to face the people impacted.

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Exactly this. The layoff decision comes from upper management or finance. Immediate managers may get to decide who goes, but it’s more likely that HR made a choice based on previous performance reviews.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Why though, it wasn’t the person firing that made the choice, but people above them. The person who made the decision never has to deal with it.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      You act like the employer would give a fuck about looking people in the face. They might even take joy watching the life leave your face as you get the news.